Intellectual Arrogance

Posted on August 1st, 2002 in Modernism, Apostasy, Subject Index, Editorials by Cox, Stan

A cursory reading of the New Testament reveals a distinct attitude taken by our Lord and his apostles regarding human wisdom. James went so far as to describe such wisdom as "sensual, demonic" and declared that it causes "envy and self-seeking… confusion and every evil thing…" (cf. James 3:15-16).

Jesus in his personal ministry dealt with men who were intellectually arrogant. This was a characteristic of both the Pharisees and the Sadducees. When Jesus had taught that eating with unwashed hands does not defile a person, defilement rather coming from within, his disciples informed him that the teaching offended the Pharisees. No doubt it did, as it set aside the traditions they held dear. Concerning them, Jesus said, "Let them alone. They are blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind leads the blind, both will fall into a ditch" (Matthew 15:14).

Assurance - Security

Posted on August 1st, 2002 in Neo-Calvinism Error, Assurance, Security, Neo-Calvinism, Themes, Calvinism, Apostasy, Subject Index by Holmes, Bobby
This entry is part 7 of 9 in the series, Neo-Calvinism Error.

Authors: Bobby Holmes and Mark Roberts

I. Error

    A. Neo-Calvinists say:
      1. "Some sins don’t separate us from God. Christ’s blood automatically covers sins of ignorance or inadvertence.

    B. Passages Misused:

      1. 1 John 1:7-9; 5:16-17
      2. Romans 4:8
      3. 2 Corinthians 5:19

    C. Favorite Tactic:

      1. Using a hypothetical situation to make you play God.
      2. "A man is a faithful saint for 50 years, gets splashed by mud on the street one day, curses, and then is hit by a bus. Will he be lost or saved?"
      3. Don’t play God! Clemency is up to the Judge. All we can do is quote the law!

Short Gems from Larry’s Pen

Posted on February 1st, 2002 in Faith, Apostasy, Salvation, Subject Index by Hafley, Larry Ray

"Give Satan An Inch"

On the sign in front of the Baker Rd. Baptist Church, Baytown, TX, the following maxim recently appeared: "Give Satan An Inch, And He’ll Be A Ruler."

The expressed sentiment is true, for "Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin" (John 8:34). "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness" (Romans 6:16)? However, the message on the sign is contrary to Baptist doctrine. Here is how.

First, Satan cannot become a "ruler" to the lost, to alien sinners, for he is already their ruler, their "father" (John 8:38, 41, 44). Hence, since he is already their ruler, it cannot be said to sinners that if they give Satan an inch he will be their ruler.

Second, since Baptists do not believe that a child of God can fall from grace, it cannot be said that Satan will be "a ruler" of the saved. If he were, the saved would be of Satan. As such, they would be lost, for "He that committeth sin is of the devil" (1 John 3:8).

So, to whom does the Baptist sign apply? To whom will Satan "be a ruler"? Since he is the ruler of the sinner, his being a ruler cannot be contingent upon their giving him an inch. Since, according to Baptist doctrine, the saved cannot fall away and be lost, Satan will not be a ruler over them even if they give him "an inch." To whom, then, based on the condition of giving Satan an inch, will he be a ruler? Will a Baptist explain?

Did You Ever Wonder About…

We know a good bit about some folks in the Bible, but did you ever wonder about what happened to them? Men like Nicodemus, the woman of Samaria, the blind man of John 9, Zacchaeus, the rich lawyer, Joseph (Jesus’ disciple, who buried him in his own new tomb), Lazarus, the brother of Mary and Martha whom he raised from the dead. Ever wonder about what happened to them? Me, too.

It is useless to speculate. It may be dangerous to get carried away thinking of what may have happened, but putting the brakes on rambling curiosity is hard to do.

First, why are we not told more about them? That our curiosity is not satisfied is why, in part, I think the Bible cannot be a purely human production. Would men have written a book and have left that wonderment unrequited? No, men would have gone to great lengths to fill in the gaps. Human historians would have told us what happened to the eunuch when he returned to the palace of Candace. I cannot conceive that the lives of Lydia and the jailer would have been amputated from our view. Could men have closed a book without telling us what happened to (excepting the Lord himself) its most illustrious personage, Paul? I think not, but Luke did.

Second, the design of God must be considered. The cases mentioned served their purpose. For all we know, Nicodemus may have been a great man in the early church, but there were many such men and women whose names can only be read "in the Lamb’s book of life." The account of his interview with the Lord was drawn of God for our benefit. Nicodemus was not listed because of his standing but for what God planned for us to know. When that aim was accomplished, he was taken from the stage of sacred drama. We have no doubt the same is true of others we have cited — Joseph of Arimathaea, the eunuch, Lydia, Zacchaeus — they entered the scene, made their point, and were withdrawn, never to be heard from again. Why? Because they themselves were not the focus.

Third, we must remember that many cases of conversion, many men, and marvelous miracles were not selected for demonstration and declaration. John cited seven or eight miracles in his gospel, but said he left out "many other" ones (John 20:30, 31). The Spirit chose the ones he wanted for our use.

Likewise, of all the acts of the apostles, only a few were selected for us to savor. Yes, we have the arresting narrative of the eunuch and Cornelius’ conversion, but how large would the book of Acts be if it delved into all the details of particular, personal stories which lay hidden in such words as, "many of them which heard the word believed; and the number of the men was about five thousand….And the word of God increased; and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly; and a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith….And the hand of the Lord was with them: and a great number believed and turned to the Lord….But the word of God grew and multiplied" (Acts 4:4; 6:7; 11:21; 12:24)? How many thousands of stories like that of the eunuch and the jailer were excluded by the Divine penman?

Thus, when we see those given to us, we must treasure them, not as idols of wonderment, but as the reality, the finality, knowing that they were twice chosen of the Spirit before they were revealed to us.

Fourth, and finally, what of the failures of faith? In Acts 4:16, we are not left to wonder about those who stubbornly resisted the truth. Many of those who said of the word and work of the apostles, "we cannot deny it," but we are going to do so anyway, are seen obeying the truth at last (Cf. Acts 4:14-18; 6:7). That much of our curious thirst is slaked, but what of King Agrippa and Felix — did they ever again agonize over their souls? And what of the murderous men who accompanied Saul of Tarsus to Damascus to kill Christians? They heard a voice; they saw the heavenly light which was more brilliant than the noon day sun, and they led their blind and startled leader into town "by the hand," not to destroy but to pray.

This is all we know of those men. Tell me now, have you ever wondered about…

"God Spoke To My Heart"

Many proclaim their personal salvation because "God spoke to my heart and saved me." Why not accept such a claimant? Why do we not believe their testimony and receive them into the temple of God?

First, if we accept their claim, how do we deny similar visions and visits when given by Jews, Muslims, and pagan witch doctors? They, too, have had "experiences" with Deity. Upon what basis do we denounce their cases as fraudulent and deniable while pronouncing ours as faithful and reliable?

Second, Scripture shows that one’s devout faith in his "divine" encounters is not determinant; that is, they do not establish the truthfulness of one’s appeals. (a) Beyond doubt, the prophets of Baal believed their Lord was the true God (1 Kings 18:21-40). Also, beyond doubt, they were wrong! (b) The people of Samaria sincerely felt that Simon was "the great power of God," but they were in error (Acts 8:9-11). (c) Remember Saul of Tarsus? He believed that he was right in opposing the cause of Christ (Acts 23:1; 26:9-11). His experiences and personal testimony did not justify him. Despite his earnest enthusiasm, he was acting "ignorantly in unbelief" (1 Timothy 1:13). Later, the Lord spoke to him, but not to save him. Ananias was sent to tell him what he must do to be saved (Acts 9:6; 22:16). (d) One can deceive "his own heart" (James 1:26). He may, therefore, deceive himself regarding whether or not God has "touched" his heart. The Holy Spirit verifies this conclusion. "There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death" (Proverbs 14:12). "O Lord, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps" (Jeremiah 10:23).

Third, in no New Testament case of conversion did God speak to a man to save him. Neither by direct communication nor by angelic agency did the Lord ever speak to and save anyone. "Faith cometh by hearing," by hearing "the word of faith" as preached by the apostles; we are brought to belief "through their word" (Cf. Jn. 17:20; Rom. 10:8, 14, 17). Though it does not please some men, it has "pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe" (1 Cor. 1:21; 4:15; Jas. 1:18; 1 Pet. 1:23).

Objections

  1. "Didn’t the Holy Spirit fall upon people in Acts 2?" The Spirit came upon the preachers, the apostles, not upon the audience (Acts 1:26-2:4, 37). Through the words of the apostles as given by the Spirit, men were led to faith and obedience (Acts 2:37, 40, 41; Cf. Jn. 17:20; 2 Cor. 4:7; 5:18-20). It is so with us today. We have the apostolic word in the New Testament. We "hear" the apostles as those in Jesus’ day "heard" Moses and the prophets; that is, through their writings (Cf. Luke 16:31; Acts 13:27; 15:21; 2 Thessalonians 2:15).
  2. "But what about the Ethiopian eunuch?" In this case, "the angel of the Lord" and "the Spirit" spoke unto the preacher (Acts 8:26, 29). So far as the treasurer knew, no heavenly intercession was involved. The Lord spoke to the eunuch, but he did so through human agency-"Philip preached unto him Jesus" (Acts 8:35).
  3. "An angel of God spoke to Cornelius!" Yes, he did, but what did he tell him (Acts 10:3-6; 11:13, 14)? The angel told Cornelius, "Send…for Simon, whose surname is Peter; Who shall tell thee words whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved." Peter, not the angel, nor the Lord, spoke the words by which Cornelius was saved. Peter said it was "by my mouth" that Cornelius "should hear the…gospel and believe" (Acts 15:7). Cornelius knew he must hear Peter’s words in order to know the commandments of God-"We are all here present before God to hear all things that are commanded thee of God" (Acts 10:33; Cf. 10:48).

Conclusion

The consistent pattern of the accounts of conversion in the name of Christ included the preaching of the gospel to the sinner. There is no exception to this rule. "When they heard this, they were pricked in their heart….And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation. Then they that gladly received his word were baptized" (Acts 2:4, 22, 29, 37, 40, 41). "They…so spake, that a great multitude…believed" (Acts 14:1). "And many of the Corinthians hearing, believed and were baptized" (Acts 18:8).

Note a negative argument to this point. Paul spoke of Jews who had forbidden him "to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved" (1 Thessalonians 2:16). If he had spoken to them, they could be saved, but since they forbad his preaching, they could not be. "Then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts — (Why does he do this? Why does he take the word out of their hearts?) — lest they should believe and be saved" (Luke 8:12).

Before one can trust in Christ and be saved, he must hear the gospel (Ephesians 1:13). That faith comes by hearing the word of God as found in the New Testament. It can be received in no other way (1 Corinthians 4:6, 15; 15:1-4, 11).

Walking Worthy: Reaping Another Whirlwind

Posted on November 2nd, 2001 in Liberalism, Apostasy, Institutionalism, Subject Index by Smith, J.S.

“They sow the wind, And reap the whirlwind. The stalk has no bud; It shall never produce meal. If it should produce, Aliens would swallow it up” (Hosea 8:7).

The minor prophet was excoriating the false religions which Israel dallied with in their temptation of God so many centuries ago now. Such false religions plant something without substance and produce something destructive. Their adherents are without moral compass, for false religion offers either none or one inferior to God’s and thus the challenges of the world and the worldly overcome them in time.

The prophecy bears some resemblance to Christ’s parable of the sower in Matthew 13. There also, three of four souls touched by the gospel did not endure in the faith because of persecution, trial or apathy. Today, so many churches of Christ are sowing the wind in their instruction of the young that we are nearly reduced to standing back and waiting for the whirlwind when the next, untaught generation assumes pulpits, pens and presbyteries.

The Simple Gospel: Ex-Christian Association

Posted on November 1st, 2001 in Unfaithfulness, Apostasy, Subject Index by Roberts, Tom

It is not unusual these days to see a bumper sticker with some message indicating that the owner is an alumnus of some college, or member of a fraternal order or church group. Recently I saw one indicating that the driver of the car was an "ex-Ranger," probably a past member of the Rangers baseball club. This triggered a thought about the possibility of forming an association, complete with bumper sticker, of those people who used to be members of the Lord’s church and calling it the "Ex-Christian Association." Surely there are enough people around who qualify.

Hebrews 7:25 & "Once Saved, Always Saved"

Posted on October 1st, 2001 in Apostasy, Defense of Truth, Calvinism, Subject Index by Hafley, Larry Ray

"Rev. Mack Jones," of Baytown, Texas, writes a weekly column in his church bulletin entitled, "From Your Pastor’s Heart." From it, we extract the following:

"We are often questioned about the eternity of our belief. People want to know if God will disown them. The emphatic answer is, no! By no means will God ever disown one of his children. Heb. 7:25 states this very clearly; ‘Hence, also, he is able to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them’ (NAS). We are saved forever. We draw near to God through Christ, and He makes intercession for us. This gives us great assurance of our faith in Christ" (Wooster Baptist Church Messenger, Vol. 29, Number 8, 2/20/01).

Review Of Mack Jones’ Remarks

It is to be doubted that folks question "the eternity of (their) belief." Faith, like hope, is not eternal. Both shall be swallowed up in the possession of "life and immortality" brought to fruition and completion. However, we shall let that pass and deal with the main thrust of Mack’s message.

A Form of Authority

Posted on September 1st, 2001 in Apostasy, Authority, Subject Index by Hafley, Larry Ray

The veneration and exaltation of the Bible, that blessed old Book, is admirable and commendable if it be accompanied by understanding and application. But multitudes are deluded by a reverence that is nothing but superstitious sentimentalism. Souls in sectarian societies consider themselves members of the body of Christ because their "Pastor" is a "Bible toting, Bible quoting fundamentalist." The Bible is "interpreted strictly and literally" as their "only rule of faith and practice," so they think not to examine themselves whether they be in the faith (2 Corinthians 13:5).

A similar form of authority has been espoused by Christians. Since we "speak where the Bible speaks and are silent where the Bible is silent," we need not question our practices. After all, the preacher is allied and identified with "our Christian Colleges," and the elders endorse and encourage all that we do, so what fear have we? Oh, of course, we raise an eyebrow at some things that seem out of harmony with the past, but the young people are interested, so it must be right — we are just not used to it. The sole, whole authority for minds that are thus steeped in church traditionalism is the fact that "we have always been a Bible-based people." That being true, as it is assumed to be, then we are justified.

Contending for the Faith: Should We Criticize Error?

Posted on August 1st, 2001 in Apostasy, Compromise, Defense of Truth, Positive Preaching, Attitudes, Preaching, Subject Index by Hafley, Larry Ray

(Correspondence on the Question)

(Editor’s Note: The following correspondence between Larry and a teenage girl’s grandmother may be helpful to other parents and grandparents as they try to teach their children.)

    Larry,

    We had a discussion with our 16 year old granddaughter yesterday, and she is very upset with us and wants an answer to the discussion other than what we gave her.

    The discussion was over the news report about 2 gay men who had adopted a little boy, and they forced his school to do away with making anything for Mother’s Day because it made him feel uncomfortable. (My husband) said it was wrong to force their ideal on everyone since they were living in sin. (Our granddaughter) said she thought we were gossiping and that we should not judge them and just pray for them and everything would be OK. (My husband) tried to tell her we were not judging them that God’s word was judging them.

    She left us this note. Can you help us give the very best answer possible. She is a prime example of the thinking of our "church kids" today. Her Question:

      "Could you show me the verse where it says we are supposed to point out the wrong? I am just wanting to read it."

    Larry, we would really appreciate your help. We feel our answer can not be too lengthy or it will turn her off. She is 1st in her class in high school so she should be able to reason. It is very disturbing that our young people think, "Your OK I’m OK."

    We will be waiting for your answer.

Response To This Request

Here are some passages which deal with her request:

Solid Food: The Religion of Syncretism

Posted on May 1st, 2001 in Romans 14, Apostasy, Subject Index by Smith, J.S.

One of the crazes among people searching to regain a spiritual compass in their lives is what lexicographers calls syncretism. Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines it as “the combination of different forms of belief or practice.” It remarks about the verb form of the word, syncretize, “to attempt to unite and harmonize especially without critical examination or logical unity.”

Syncretism is popular because the two leading competitors for the hearts of men are less so. The first is the word of God contained in the Bible. Its popularity among men has waned because it is perceived to be antiquated and its texts unsatisfactory in meeting today’s concerns. The second is the religion taught in your public schools, secular humanism, in which each individual is instructed to be his own god and make his own standard of morality.

Humanism has been such a tragic failure in terms of increased drug abuse, laziness and uninhibited sexual experimentation that many baby boomers — the first generation spoon fed the stuff — are in search of something higher. Naturally, many turn first to the Bible, but its instruction is, for them, further in the opposite direction than they intended to travel. The magic solution is to mix the desirable liberties of humanism with the basic guiding force of the Bible. The product is a potluck night stew: prepared with a little of this and a little of that.

Are Those Who “Sleep On Watch” Traitors to the Cause of Christ?

Posted on October 1st, 2000 in Apostasy, Preacher, Defense of Truth, Watchmen, Attitudes, Preaching, Subject Index by Smith, Marc

There is no more despicable behavior among men of war than the traitor. A great gulf lies between the valiant warrior and the traitor.

Just think of the examples we can take from famous battles of true selfless devotion and sacrifice for the sake of others. Too numerous to count have been the lives that were freely given with the full knowledge that they themselves would die so that others might enjoy some benefit of their ultimate gift. We know this is the most noble sacrifice of all because our Lord offered Himself for us so that we might have eternal life. He respects this selflessness when shown in man, as well. John 15:13, “Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one’s life for his friends.” We too, are to display this greatest form of love and honor it highly.

Being a Texan, I always think of the Alamo and its place not just in Texas history but in the greater story of democracy for the entire American Nation. There are examples of battles from wars in ancient history that had even greater importance than those that usually come so easily to our minds.

Page 1 of 2