In the Steps of the Savior: Old-Fashioned Honesty

Posted on February 2nd, 2002 in Honesty, Subject Index by Osborne, Harry

One writer observed of modern society, "A commentary on the times is that the word honesty is now preceded by old-fashioned." Over the past few years, we have all seen diminished respect for the virtue of telling the truth in various quarters. The adjudicated finding of guilt on perjury charges brought against our last president was surely a disgraceful evidence of the pervasive presence of dishonesty in our modern world. The widespread use of falsehood is not consistent with the values and character expected in the world of my upbringing. My earliest remembrance of character education is the teaching to always be honest. Whether at home or in school, in Bible classes or in the community, honesty was a mandatory virtue in each person and it was commonly accepted that lying was the worst thing one could do. While still a teenager, I came in contact with several people who made a practice out of falsehood and deceit. Since that time, I have witnessed the same proclivity in those who sought power for themselves in various realms. Is it merely being "old-fashioned" to seek a return to a world where honesty is again viewed with the highest respect?

Our Example of "Old-Fashioned" Honesty

In John 8, there is a clear contrast presented between Jesus who told the truth and the leaders of the Jews who lied. At one point, the leaders of the Jews claimed, "We are Abraham’s seed, and have never yet been in bondage to any man" (John 8:33). The fact is that Abraham’s seed, the Israelites, had been in both Egyptian bondage and Babylonian captivity. The Jewish leaders’ lying attempt to bolster their own importance was at variance with the truth. This was not the first time they had lied, nor would it be their last. They had lied about their respect for Jesus while trying to harm him. They would ultimately get men to testify falsely against Jesus to give a false veneer of justice to cover their murderous act. When Jesus arose from the dead, the same people would conspire to lie in a vain effort to conceal His resurrection. Jesus well summarized their character by noting their moral parentage:

Jeremiah’s Lamentation

Posted on February 2nd, 2002 in Lamentation, Subject Index by Smith, J.S.

Introduction

Lamentations is one of those obscure books of the Old Testament that we don’t give much attention. While we flock to Psalm 23 and congregate around the Proverbs, Lamentations sits alone, not far off, waiting for us. And yet books like Lamentations, Philemon and Zephaniah are no less a part of God’s word than Genesis or Romans. The theme of Lamentations is actually quite pertinent and valuable today, for it speaks of a physical decay resembling the spiritual decline of our own great nation.

Jeremiah’s Lamentation

Around six hundred years before Christ, after Israel had fallen to Assyria, Judah also descended into the pits of corruption and sin. The youthful prophet Jeremiah had begged his nation to understand the fate of Israel and turn back to God and yet, she would not (Jer. 5), and now, shortly after good king Josiah was killed in battle by Pharaoh Necho, Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon had come to power and conquered Judah (2 Kings 24:3-4).

Contending for the Faith: Thoughts on Speaking in Tongues

Posted on February 2nd, 2002 in Tongue Speaking, Charismatic, Subject Index by Hafley, Larry Ray

The following request recently came to me:

    Would you mind sharing your thoughts on 1 Corinthians 13:1; 14:2 and the issue of speaking in tongues. My brother is a Pentecostal, and we have discussed this issue (along with several other issues) at length. I have pointed out that tongues is being able to speak in other languages, which he agrees with but then he says it is also speaking in the tongue of angels — saying his spirit is speaking to God — as he points out in the verses above. Can you offer some insight on what the "tongues of angels," 13:1, and "For one who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men, but to God; for no one understands, but in his spirit he speaks mysteries," 14:2?

First, though Paul is using hyperbolic (exaggerated) language to stress a point in 1 Corinthians 13:1-3, he gives no comfort to modern Pentecostalism. Men do have tongues, or languages (Acts 2:4, 6, 8, 11; 1 Corinthians 13:1). Those tongues, or languages, are not incoherent, multi-syllable jibber jabber. Rather, they are coherent, comprehensible languages, as Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians 14 clearly show.

(Compare Cornelius and his household who spoke in tongues. Those present knew the languages spoken, for they knew they were magnifying God [Acts 10:46]. However, they could not have known if they were magnifying or maligning God if they had not understood the languages. See 1 Corinthians 14:9, 16 "except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken….how shall he that occupieth the room of the unlearned [’the unlearned’ one is simply the one who does not know the language spoken-LRH] say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?" Further, we know the languages spoken by Cornelius ["the Gentiles"] were understandable, for Peter said it reminded him of "the beginning" at Pentecost, and we know those languages were understood by those who heard them [Acts 2:4-11].)

The Simple Gospel: Thanksgiving

Posted on February 2nd, 2002 in Thanksgiving, Subject Index by Roberts, Tom

Being "thankful" to God is often spoken of as a "duty," and "obligation." While no objection can rightfully be registered to thanksgiving as such, we surely must not limit our understanding of it to this realm. One might as well think of watermelon as being composed only of rind, or of roses only of thorns if we fail to see the purely voluntary and "from-the-heart" side of thanksgiving. While duty and obligation define the obedient nature of the children of God, there is much more to our relationship to God than response to commands.

That being "thankful" is a command is evident from the scriptures. Both the Old Testament and the New remind us not to be forgetful of God’s bountiful blessings. Psalm 100:4 teaches, "…be thankful unto him and bless his name…" Colossians 3:15, after reminding us that the peace of Christ should rule our hearts, says, "…and be ye thankful." Without a doubt, we need such reminders. Like little children must be taught not to take favors from others for granted but to say "thank you," so also must we be reminded not to take God for granted. But here is the difference we must strive to see. A little child may be polite and, from the result of training in the home, say "thank you" when given something, observing etiquette alone, without feeling grateful in his heart. This is quite different from actually being thankful for the favor bestowed.

How Was Christ ‘Made to be Sin’?

Posted on February 2nd, 2002 in Grace, Calvinism, Sin, Associate Editorials, Subject Index by Roberts, Tom

One aspect of Calvinistic doctrine is the three-fold error whereby it is taught that (1) Adam’s sin was transferred to mankind; (2) man’s sin was transferred to Christ; and (30) Christ’s personal righteousness was transferred to believers. None of these statements are true nor do they reflect accurately the Bible doctrine of "imputation." In this article we will note the second of these errors and study the claim that the sins of mankind have been transferred to Christ.

A verse often used in this context is 2 Corinthians 5:21: "Him who knew no sin he made to be sin on our behalf; that we might become the righteousness of God in him." The phrase "he made to be sin" is the controversial part of the text and one that is grossly misused. We need to understand in what sense God made Christ "to be sin." Did God place our sins on Christ? Would that make Christ a sinner? Did Christ die a spiritual death as well as a physical death on the cross? Just what is meant? As in all studies, we need to consider all that the Bible says and not take one verse to mean something that would contradict other Bible passages.

Honor in Controversy: Revisited

Posted on February 2nd, 2002 in Controversy, Integrity, Defense of Truth, Debate, Subject Index, Editorials by Cox, Stan

In August of 2000, in the midst of the controversy stirred by the publication of the "Open Letter" on the Creation "Days" controversy, I penned an editorial entitled Honor in Controversy. In the article I pointed out the carnal tactics to which some resorted at that time. I sought to point out the need for brethren to behave righteously during times of controversy as we discuss differences which exist. It is a lesson that needs repeating time and again.

It is inappropriate for any child of God to behave in less than a righteous manner. Peter wrote, "Beloved, I beg you as sojourners and pilgrims, abstain from fleshly lusts which war against the soul, having your conduct honorable among the Gentiles, that when they speak against you as evildoers, they may, by your good works which they observe, glorify God in the day of visitation" (1 Peter 2:11-12). The term "honorable" in the passage (translated honest in the KJV) is defined by Vines, "good, admirable, becoming, has also the ethical meaning of what is fair, right, honourable, of such conduct as deserves esteem" (Vines, Vol. II, pge. 229).

It is important for Christians to be "fair" and "right" in their dealing with others, especially brethren. This is what God expects of us. Further reading in 1 Peter 2 reveals this, "For this is the will of God, that by doing good you may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men; as free, yet not using liberty as a cloak for vice, but as bondservants of God. Honor all people. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the king" (vss. 15-17).

Preaching in the Pacific Northwest - Report 2 (1998, 1999, 2001)

Posted on February 2nd, 2002 in Evangelism, Evangelist, Subject Index by Stan

Editor’s Note: This is the second of two articles recounting brother Holmes’ preaching trips to, primarily, the Pacific Northwest.

1998

Jo Ann and I waited until the first of May in 1998 to leave for the Northwest again. We did this for two reasons. First, to give us time to "get over" the grueling task of the eleven month work in 1997 and second, I needed time to work on some material for the trip.

My first meeting on this trip was in Rock Springs, Wyoming. We had planned on leaving early Monday morning, but Jo Ann became very ill with a virus like condition that caused, among other things, severe vomiting and extreme weakness. I took her to our doctor Monday morning explaining our need to leave as soon as possible and he gave her some strong medication including something to "put her out" to overcome the vomiting. Though she was still not feeling "up to par", we left on Wednesday and traveled hard as I was to begin the meeting in Rock Springs on Sunday.

Preaching in the Pacific Northwest: Report 1 (1997)

Posted on February 1st, 2002 in Evangelism, Evangelist, Subject Index by Holmes, Bobby

Editor’s Note: This is the first of two articles recounting brother Holmes’ preaching trips to, primarily, the Pacific Northwest.

On January 3rd, 1997, JoAnn (my wife) and I left our home in Duncanville Texas and spent eleven months on an extended preaching trip, at least half of it in the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Wisconsin and the province of Alberta Canada. The rest of the time was spent in my holding meetings in Ohio, Mississippi, W. Virginia and the south Texas area.

In preparation for the trip I resigned as an evangelist for the Dallas Avenue church in Lancaster Texas December 31, 1996 after fourteen years of the best local work of my almost fifty years of preaching. With the help of a working membership who helped to arrange Bible studies for me, I baptized over 100 souls into Christ during that time.

The eleven month trip in 1997 came about as a result of several years of preaching trips I had taken into Canada. Four days driving up and four days back home put me in contact with several souls who would ask, "Why can’t you come help us?". Most of these brethren had no preacher to work with them and were struggling. A burning desire to help these precious souls began to grow within me until finally I told Jo Ann and the elders at Dallas Avenue that I simply had to go before I grew too old and my health failed me.

Short Gems from Larry’s Pen

Posted on February 1st, 2002 in Faith, Apostasy, Salvation, Subject Index by Hafley, Larry Ray

"Give Satan An Inch"

On the sign in front of the Baker Rd. Baptist Church, Baytown, TX, the following maxim recently appeared: "Give Satan An Inch, And He’ll Be A Ruler."

The expressed sentiment is true, for "Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin" (John 8:34). "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness" (Romans 6:16)? However, the message on the sign is contrary to Baptist doctrine. Here is how.

First, Satan cannot become a "ruler" to the lost, to alien sinners, for he is already their ruler, their "father" (John 8:38, 41, 44). Hence, since he is already their ruler, it cannot be said to sinners that if they give Satan an inch he will be their ruler.

Second, since Baptists do not believe that a child of God can fall from grace, it cannot be said that Satan will be "a ruler" of the saved. If he were, the saved would be of Satan. As such, they would be lost, for "He that committeth sin is of the devil" (1 John 3:8).

So, to whom does the Baptist sign apply? To whom will Satan "be a ruler"? Since he is the ruler of the sinner, his being a ruler cannot be contingent upon their giving him an inch. Since, according to Baptist doctrine, the saved cannot fall away and be lost, Satan will not be a ruler over them even if they give him "an inch." To whom, then, based on the condition of giving Satan an inch, will he be a ruler? Will a Baptist explain?

Did You Ever Wonder About…

We know a good bit about some folks in the Bible, but did you ever wonder about what happened to them? Men like Nicodemus, the woman of Samaria, the blind man of John 9, Zacchaeus, the rich lawyer, Joseph (Jesus’ disciple, who buried him in his own new tomb), Lazarus, the brother of Mary and Martha whom he raised from the dead. Ever wonder about what happened to them? Me, too.

It is useless to speculate. It may be dangerous to get carried away thinking of what may have happened, but putting the brakes on rambling curiosity is hard to do.

First, why are we not told more about them? That our curiosity is not satisfied is why, in part, I think the Bible cannot be a purely human production. Would men have written a book and have left that wonderment unrequited? No, men would have gone to great lengths to fill in the gaps. Human historians would have told us what happened to the eunuch when he returned to the palace of Candace. I cannot conceive that the lives of Lydia and the jailer would have been amputated from our view. Could men have closed a book without telling us what happened to (excepting the Lord himself) its most illustrious personage, Paul? I think not, but Luke did.

Second, the design of God must be considered. The cases mentioned served their purpose. For all we know, Nicodemus may have been a great man in the early church, but there were many such men and women whose names can only be read "in the Lamb’s book of life." The account of his interview with the Lord was drawn of God for our benefit. Nicodemus was not listed because of his standing but for what God planned for us to know. When that aim was accomplished, he was taken from the stage of sacred drama. We have no doubt the same is true of others we have cited — Joseph of Arimathaea, the eunuch, Lydia, Zacchaeus — they entered the scene, made their point, and were withdrawn, never to be heard from again. Why? Because they themselves were not the focus.

Third, we must remember that many cases of conversion, many men, and marvelous miracles were not selected for demonstration and declaration. John cited seven or eight miracles in his gospel, but said he left out "many other" ones (John 20:30, 31). The Spirit chose the ones he wanted for our use.

Likewise, of all the acts of the apostles, only a few were selected for us to savor. Yes, we have the arresting narrative of the eunuch and Cornelius’ conversion, but how large would the book of Acts be if it delved into all the details of particular, personal stories which lay hidden in such words as, "many of them which heard the word believed; and the number of the men was about five thousand….And the word of God increased; and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly; and a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith….And the hand of the Lord was with them: and a great number believed and turned to the Lord….But the word of God grew and multiplied" (Acts 4:4; 6:7; 11:21; 12:24)? How many thousands of stories like that of the eunuch and the jailer were excluded by the Divine penman?

Thus, when we see those given to us, we must treasure them, not as idols of wonderment, but as the reality, the finality, knowing that they were twice chosen of the Spirit before they were revealed to us.

Fourth, and finally, what of the failures of faith? In Acts 4:16, we are not left to wonder about those who stubbornly resisted the truth. Many of those who said of the word and work of the apostles, "we cannot deny it," but we are going to do so anyway, are seen obeying the truth at last (Cf. Acts 4:14-18; 6:7). That much of our curious thirst is slaked, but what of King Agrippa and Felix — did they ever again agonize over their souls? And what of the murderous men who accompanied Saul of Tarsus to Damascus to kill Christians? They heard a voice; they saw the heavenly light which was more brilliant than the noon day sun, and they led their blind and startled leader into town "by the hand," not to destroy but to pray.

This is all we know of those men. Tell me now, have you ever wondered about…

"God Spoke To My Heart"

Many proclaim their personal salvation because "God spoke to my heart and saved me." Why not accept such a claimant? Why do we not believe their testimony and receive them into the temple of God?

First, if we accept their claim, how do we deny similar visions and visits when given by Jews, Muslims, and pagan witch doctors? They, too, have had "experiences" with Deity. Upon what basis do we denounce their cases as fraudulent and deniable while pronouncing ours as faithful and reliable?

Second, Scripture shows that one’s devout faith in his "divine" encounters is not determinant; that is, they do not establish the truthfulness of one’s appeals. (a) Beyond doubt, the prophets of Baal believed their Lord was the true God (1 Kings 18:21-40). Also, beyond doubt, they were wrong! (b) The people of Samaria sincerely felt that Simon was "the great power of God," but they were in error (Acts 8:9-11). (c) Remember Saul of Tarsus? He believed that he was right in opposing the cause of Christ (Acts 23:1; 26:9-11). His experiences and personal testimony did not justify him. Despite his earnest enthusiasm, he was acting "ignorantly in unbelief" (1 Timothy 1:13). Later, the Lord spoke to him, but not to save him. Ananias was sent to tell him what he must do to be saved (Acts 9:6; 22:16). (d) One can deceive "his own heart" (James 1:26). He may, therefore, deceive himself regarding whether or not God has "touched" his heart. The Holy Spirit verifies this conclusion. "There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death" (Proverbs 14:12). "O Lord, I know that the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps" (Jeremiah 10:23).

Third, in no New Testament case of conversion did God speak to a man to save him. Neither by direct communication nor by angelic agency did the Lord ever speak to and save anyone. "Faith cometh by hearing," by hearing "the word of faith" as preached by the apostles; we are brought to belief "through their word" (Cf. Jn. 17:20; Rom. 10:8, 14, 17). Though it does not please some men, it has "pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe" (1 Cor. 1:21; 4:15; Jas. 1:18; 1 Pet. 1:23).

Objections

  1. "Didn’t the Holy Spirit fall upon people in Acts 2?" The Spirit came upon the preachers, the apostles, not upon the audience (Acts 1:26-2:4, 37). Through the words of the apostles as given by the Spirit, men were led to faith and obedience (Acts 2:37, 40, 41; Cf. Jn. 17:20; 2 Cor. 4:7; 5:18-20). It is so with us today. We have the apostolic word in the New Testament. We "hear" the apostles as those in Jesus’ day "heard" Moses and the prophets; that is, through their writings (Cf. Luke 16:31; Acts 13:27; 15:21; 2 Thessalonians 2:15).
  2. "But what about the Ethiopian eunuch?" In this case, "the angel of the Lord" and "the Spirit" spoke unto the preacher (Acts 8:26, 29). So far as the treasurer knew, no heavenly intercession was involved. The Lord spoke to the eunuch, but he did so through human agency-"Philip preached unto him Jesus" (Acts 8:35).
  3. "An angel of God spoke to Cornelius!" Yes, he did, but what did he tell him (Acts 10:3-6; 11:13, 14)? The angel told Cornelius, "Send…for Simon, whose surname is Peter; Who shall tell thee words whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved." Peter, not the angel, nor the Lord, spoke the words by which Cornelius was saved. Peter said it was "by my mouth" that Cornelius "should hear the…gospel and believe" (Acts 15:7). Cornelius knew he must hear Peter’s words in order to know the commandments of God-"We are all here present before God to hear all things that are commanded thee of God" (Acts 10:33; Cf. 10:48).

Conclusion

The consistent pattern of the accounts of conversion in the name of Christ included the preaching of the gospel to the sinner. There is no exception to this rule. "When they heard this, they were pricked in their heart….And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation. Then they that gladly received his word were baptized" (Acts 2:4, 22, 29, 37, 40, 41). "They…so spake, that a great multitude…believed" (Acts 14:1). "And many of the Corinthians hearing, believed and were baptized" (Acts 18:8).

Note a negative argument to this point. Paul spoke of Jews who had forbidden him "to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved" (1 Thessalonians 2:16). If he had spoken to them, they could be saved, but since they forbad his preaching, they could not be. "Then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts — (Why does he do this? Why does he take the word out of their hearts?) — lest they should believe and be saved" (Luke 8:12).

Before one can trust in Christ and be saved, he must hear the gospel (Ephesians 1:13). That faith comes by hearing the word of God as found in the New Testament. It can be received in no other way (1 Corinthians 4:6, 15; 15:1-4, 11).

The Days of Creation: Literal or Figurative?

Posted on February 1st, 2002 in Subject Index by Mikell, Ira

Moses, inspired by God, penned the beautiful words describing the account of creation in the first chapter of the book of Genesis. The first words that were written were “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth,” (Genesis 1:1). In the verses that follow it is commonly understood that creation took place over a period of six days. There has been much debate, however, among brethren, especially during the ongoing controversy between brethren and a few of the Bible teachers at Florida College, over this teaching that affects our entrance into Heaven. Some say that the days of creation are literal, while others believe that the days are figurative. Then, there are those who say the days could be both, in the name of unity-in-diversity. But, what does the Bible say?

The word “day” is used both literally and figuratively throughout the Scriptures. In order to identify which, it is necessary to consider the context first. After this has been accomplished, it is possible to know what the word “day” is referring to in a particular passage. Before we examine a few examples of the word “day,” the following table from a previous article, The Gift in Acts 2:38 that I wrote, found at:
http://members.truepath.com/thechristianexaminer/01number26.html#gift,
illustrates how some words and phrases are used differently in various passages.

Page 1 of 2